Construção Social das Práticas Organizacionais

Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Patologia Ambiental e Experimental

Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Patologia Ambiental e Experimental da UNIP é nota 5 na CAPES
Siga o Programa nas redes sociais:
Ementa:
Institucionalismo sociológico. Atores Sociais. Sistema Interinstitucional. Fundamentos Culturais e Materiais das Instituições. Práticas, Estruturas, Sentido. Alternativas de Construção Social. Mecanismos de Promoção de Sentido. Legitimidade. Estratégia como Prática. Governança. Objetivo acadêmico geral O propósito da disciplina é o desenvolvimento de competências associadas à compreensão das operações e da cadeia de suprimentos sob a perspectiva de redes organizacionais. Nesse sentido, a proposta baseia-se na leitura, apresentação e discussão de textos afeitos à investigação de redes de operações e cadeias de suprimentos, segundo abordagens orientadas para o entendimento em termos de indicadores estruturais e resultado de negócio.
Bibliografia:
BROWN, A. D.; COLVILLE, I.; PYE, A. Making sense of sensemaking in organization studies. Organization Studies, v. 36, n. 2, p. 265-277, 2015.
FRIEDLAND, R.; ALFORD, R. Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In: POWELL, W. W.; DIMAGGIO, P. J. (ed.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
HININGS, B. C. R.; LOGUE, D.; ZIETSMA, C. Fields, institutional infrastructure and governance. In: GREENWOOD, R.; OLIVER, C.; LAWRENCE, T. B.; MEYER, R. (ed.). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. 2. ed. London; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2017. p. 163-189.
LOUNSBURY, M.; CRUMLEY, E. T. New practice creation: an institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, v. 28, n. 7, p. 993-1012, 2007.
OCASIO, W.; RADOYNOVSKA, N. Strategy and commitments to institutional logics: organizational heterogeneity in business models and governance. Strategic Organization, v. 14, n. 4, p. 287-309, 2016.
SMETS, M.; ARISTIDOU, A.; WHITTINGTON, R. Towards a practice-driven institutionalism. In: GREENWOOD, R.; OLIVER, C.; LAWRENCE, T. B.; MEYER, R. (ed.). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. 2. ed. London: Sage, 2017. p. 384-411.
THORNTON, P. H.; OCASIO, W.; LOUNSBURY, M. Dynamics of organizational practices and identities. In: THORNTON, P. H.; OCASIO, W.; LOUNSBURY, M. (ed.). The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2012. cap. 6.
THORNTON, P. H.; OCASIO, W. Institutional logics. In: GREENWOOD, R.; OLIVER, C.; SUDDABY, R. (ed.). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage, 2008.
WHITTINGTON, R. Completing the practice turn in strategy research. Organization Studies, v. 27, n. 5, p. 613-634, 2006.
Referência Complementar
ABOLAFIA, M. Y. Narrative construction as sensemaking: how a central bank thinks. Organization Studies, v. 31, p. 349-367, 2010.
GREENWOOD, R.; RAYNARD, M.; KODEIH, F.; MICELOTTA, E. R.; LOUNSBURY, M. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, v. 5, n. 1, p. 317-371, 2011.
HAVEMAN, H. A.; GUALTIERI, G. Institutional logics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
KRAATZ, M. S.; BLOCK, E. S. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In: SUDDABY, R.; SAHLIN, K. (ed.). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage, 2008. p. 243-275.
RAYNARD, M.; GREENWOOD, R. Deconstructing complexity: how organizations cope with multiple institutional logics. Academy of Management Proceedings, v. 2014, n. 1, p. 12907, 2014.
SMETS, M.; ARISTIDOU, A.; WHITTINGTON, R. Towards a practice-driven institutionalism. In: GREENWOOD, R.; OLIVER, C.; LAWRENCE, T. B.; MEYER, R. (ed.). The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. 2. ed. London: Sage, 2017. p. 384-411.
VERMEULEN, P. A. M.; ZIETSMA, C.; GREENWOOD, R.; LANGLEY, A. Strategic responses to institutional complexity. Strategic Organization, v. 14, n. 4, p. 277-286, 2016.
WALDORFF, S. B.; REAY, T.; GOODRICK, E. A tale of two countries: how different constellations of logics impact action. In: LOUNSBURY, M.; BOXENBAUM, E. (ed.). Institutional logics in action, part A. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, v. 39A, p. 99-129. Bingley: Emerald, 2013.
ZILBER, T. B. Stories and the discursive dynamics of institutional entrepreneurship: the case of Israeli high-tech after the bubble. Organization Studies, v. 28, p. 1035-1054, 2007.